156 Royce Hall, UCLA

Wednesday 2:00-3:15 pm October 23, 2019 

“Christianity in an Age of Artificial Intelligence”

Dr. Heup Young Kim

Visiting Professor of Theology, Graduate Theological Union

Emeritus Professor at Kangnam University

The recent development of Artificial Intelligence brings about serious issues in Christianity and theology. The possibility that Artificial General Intelligence (Strong AI) or Super Intelligence can achieve digital omnipresence, omniscience, and omnipotence challenges the traditional doctrine of divine attributes. The anticipation that AGI or ASI will soon possess superintelligence endangers the validity of Christian theologies which have adopted the logos, a cardinal Greek concept, as the root-metaphor. For the logos in the modern thought has become narrowly defined as a technical reasoning (intelligence) since the Enlightenment. This logos-centralism brought a theological reduction to perceive God as superintelligence, which could be equated with a superintelligent AI. Therefore, the advent of superintelligent AI could finish logos theologies with ultraintelligent and omnipotent God. In hi-tech places such as Silicon Valley, there already appear new techno-religious movements that enthrone and worship AI as a divine status. Furthermore, transhumanists fervently advocate techno-utopian vision that, with the maximum use of science and AGI technology, humans can achieve the paradise foretold in the Gospel, without tears, sufferings, diseases, and even death. This lecture will engage in two major tasks. 1) It critically analyzes these coming issues of AI and Transhumanism. 2) It proposes a major theological paradigm shift from the traditional theology of theo-logos to a new paradigm of theo-dao, adopting a cardinal East Asian concept of Dao (the Way) as an alternate root-metaphor for this theological revision, in and through interreligious and interdisciplinary dialogues with both East Asian religions (Confucianism and Daoism) and sciences/technologies.

—————————————————————————————————-

10383 Bunche Hal

Wednesday 3:30-5:00 pm May 15, 2019 

“Rage:  Underside, Blindside, and Upperside”

Dr. Angela Son

Associate Professor of Psychology and Religion, Drew University

Both public and Christian understandings of rage do not recognize its constructive and vital side necessary for transformation to take place. This talk aims to revise current theology and the practice of Christianity by expanding its understanding of rage from a simplistic and narrow view of its destructive nature to a wider definition that encompasses its unrecognized and transformational aspects. Based on Kohut’s understanding of narcissistic rage, I discuss rage in this work that pertains to dispositional rage, i.e., rage manifested in life’s pattern or more likely fused into one’s character.

In this presentation, I explore the underside, blindside, and upperside of rage. The underside of rage is immature rage that takes a posture of offense manifesting in a loss of control due to one’s unreasonable and disproportionate (and thus unfulfilled) expectations. The blindside of rage is wounded rage that takes on a posture of resignation resulting in the loss of self-agency inflicted by others. The upperside of rage is mature rage that takes on a posture of resilience in response to a loss of justice in one’s life or in the plight of those who are subject to wounded rage. I then attribute theological categories of unrighteous rage, deprived rage, and righteous rage respectively to these categories of rage.

I also demonstrate the underside of rage with Robert M. Grant’s understanding of Jewish Apocalypticists which gave birth to Gnosticism, the blindside of rage with the silence of the Korean comfort girls-women who were forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during WW II and the upperside of rage with the courageous act of Emmett Til’s mother revealing the horrendous injustice done to her son.

Angela Son flyer

---

 Soojin Chung, Director of Intercultural Studies and Assistant Professor of Christian Studies, California Baptist University

3:30-4:45 Oct. 31, 2018. Public Affairs 1222

“Hero or Villain: The Holts and the Korean Adoption Boom, 1955–60″

In 1955 the “Holt Bill” of the Congress enabled the Holts to adopt eight orphans from Korea. The Holts, evangelical Christians in Oregon, received tremendous media attention and opened doors for countless American families to seek out Asian children to adopt. Oregon Senator Richard Neuberger declared that these families were modern incarnations of the “Biblical Good Samaritan.” What explains the dramatic shift from the image of Asians as strange, despicable “pig-tailed coolies” to the image of adoptable and lovely children in need of American help? This talk examines the Holts’ unconventional method of placing adoptees exclusively in Christian homes. It expounds on the significance of their evangelical theology and the reason for the sharp contrast between their philosophy of adoption and the social workers’ policies. Specifically, the chapter examines the significance and perils of the “proxy adoption” that the Holts advocated. Contrary to the prevalent understanding that exalts Harry Holt as the sole charismatic individual who popularized transnational adoption, this study argues that prior to his activities, other key individuals were involved in transnational adoption. Moreover, the study refutes the dominant viewpoint of social scientific works that equate his humanitarian activities to militarized American imperialism.

---

Sung Deuk Oak, Dongsoon Im and Mija Im Endowed Chair Associate Porofessor of Korean Christianity, UCLA

Aug. 13 , 2018. Royce Hall 243

“Jerusalem of Korea versus Korea of Jerusalem, 1920-1930.”

  

---

 Seon-Wook Kim, Professor & Chair, Department of Philosophy, Soongsil University, Seoul, Chair, Institute for Values and Ethics 

Many of the Korean immigrants were Christian converts and had come to the United States with the blessing of their home churches in Korea. It was logical that these Christian Koreans would seek a church they could join and seek help from. In 1905, attracted by Pachappa Camp and the Korean Labor Bureau established by Dosan Ahn Chang Ho, Koreans began to move to Riverside in large numbers. Koreans who came to Riverside presented themselves to the elders at Calvary Presbyterian Church and requested admission. The church kept detailed records of the Koreans and other ethnicities in the area in their session of minutes.

The church and its leaders and members played a vital role in assisting the growing Korean community at Pachappa Camp. The church established a mission at the camp sometime in 1905. The church provided the Korean settlement with teachers for English classes, loans and charitable donations, and guidance. Calvary Presbyterian Church is closely intertwined with the Korean American history in Riverside. Individuals including Cornelius E. Rumsey – a church elder in the early 1900s – and the church’s pastor helped the Koreans and Pachappa Camp adapt to life in the citrus rich community.

 

The political landscape changed in Washington with the unexpected comingof young and militant Theodore Roosevelt to the White House. By 1904,the Japanese had built a powerful navy with foreign ships and western banksin America, London and Berlin financed the Japanese attack on the RussianNavy in Feb. 1904. With the tacit backing of Theodore Roosevelt,the Japanese seized Korean sovereignty in 1905, through a ruse and forcedEmperor Kojong’s abdication in July of 1907. The majority of western missionaries withdrew from political involvement during this period and remainedsilent on the Japanese takeover of Korea, even as they continued to promotethe growth of the Christian church. Although they would begin to changetheir minds by 1912, as Japanese rule increased in brutality, the damagewas done to the cause of an independent and sovereign Korea and anhistorical blackout remained on this brief period for almost a 100 years.This paper will explore why the missionaries reversed their support for theKorean Crown in 1904 and by what rationale were these decisions made.